Forget ‘superintelligence’: error-prone AI nearly sparked world war three this month | Timnit Gebru and Emily M Bender

    Forget ‘superintelligence’: error-prone AI nearly sparked world war three this month | Timnit Gebru and Emily M Bender
    ORIGINAL REPORTING BBC News View Original Article ↗

    The risks of AI aren’t what we think they are, as a recent security incident between China and the United States reveals

    Amid a barrage of news stories warning about superintelligent machines rendering humanity extinct, a CNN story describing the opposite scenario – one in which the US military’s reliance on brittle chatbots almost brought the US into war with China – went mostly unnoticed by the public.

    The biggest international AI news of the past three weeks was Anthropic engineer Jacob Coxon’s resignation. According to him, OpenAI and Anthropic are “racing straight towards self-improving superintelligence and gambling with our lives”. Coxon’s description of a “terminator” scenario, a machine becoming much smarter than humanity and deciding to wipe us out, captured the public, journalists’ and politicians’ attention, stirring waves of fear-inducing, credulous reporting, and policy actions.

    Timnit Gebru is executive director of Dair and author of the forthcoming book US news | The Guardian

    VOICE YOUR OPINION

    DO YOU SUPPORT A BOYCOTT RELATED TO THIS STORY?

    Voting results reflect responses submitted by site visitors and do not represent the views, opinions, or endorsements of Boycott Report or its owner. Results are informal and are not a scientific poll.

    VOICE YOUR OPINION

    Do you support a boycott related to this story?

    Maximum 500 characters.

    COMMUNITY RESULTS

    YES — BOYCOTT 0%
    0 votes
    NO — DON'T BOYCOTT 0%
    0 votes
    NEED MORE INFORMATION 0%
    0 votes

    Total votes: 0

    Voting results reflect responses submitted by site visitors and do not represent the views, opinions, or endorsements of Boycott Report or its owner. Results are informal and are not a scientific poll.

    Write a Comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *